As far as art goes, I agree that “Mormon” art in general is far too “kitchy”. Sometimes I get frustrated with the idea that there are people out there who are creating a specific type of art simply because it sells to the mass mormon market. In other words, sacrificing true artistic excellence and sinking to a lower form of craft, simply to make money.

My husband is a designer and therefore has a great artistic eye. Over the years we have collected a variety of art which we display in our home. Some of it is expensive, original pieces. Others are prints. Others are “mormon” art–mostly Minerva Tiechert prints, which we love on so many levels. I do think that art is in the eye of the beholder. Display what you love, and what moves you–do not give another thought as to what your neighbor likes or has on their walls. If you feel your “taste” in art is too pedestrial, study art, and you will develop a different level of appreciation.

I can’t stand James Christensen or Thomas Kinkade.

I say go to local galleries. I have a signed Gayla Price print of a woman in a field of flowers in a dress that looks remarkably like my wedding dress that I found for $10.

I have always loved Van Goghs Starry Night so we have a print of that over our bed. My mom quilted a bedspread with fabric that matches the painting. In our mud room we have Nighthawks because I’ve always loved that picture.

My other gripe: research. I realize not everyone has my own particular obsession, but the artists who are publishing “early Restoration” work are just hosing up the clothing and material culture details. Really hosing.

I appreciate all who have shared their own tastes and links to great sites, and have allowed for a wide spectrum of differences when it comes to what we have in our homes.

p.s. I have dried weeds on my wall, too.

I love hearing everyone’s opinion and love all the great links.