<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WARNING!  CONTENT MIGHT BE OFFENSIVE OR WITHOUT MERIT!  READ AT YOUR OWN RISK!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/</link>
	<description>Mormon women blogging about the peculiar and the treasured</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather H.</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15055</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15055</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the questions Melonie and the food for thought everyone else.

There&#039;s been so much said, I don&#039;t even know what to add. But I will say that knowing my mom had some lingerie she packed up for vacations with my dad didn&#039;t hurt my attitude toward sex at all. And for our second anniversary my husband and I went to Barnes and Noble to peruse the section of sex books and were very pleased to find one written specifically for people in committed relationships that just gave us some good advice and ideas. We had the other books written by church members that talked about the doctrine of it, but we needed some help with the mechanics and hey, it helps. A good fitting leopard print bra can help sometimes too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the questions Melonie and the food for thought everyone else.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been so much said, I don&#8217;t even know what to add. But I will say that knowing my mom had some lingerie she packed up for vacations with my dad didn&#8217;t hurt my attitude toward sex at all. And for our second anniversary my husband and I went to Barnes and Noble to peruse the section of sex books and were very pleased to find one written specifically for people in committed relationships that just gave us some good advice and ideas. We had the other books written by church members that talked about the doctrine of it, but we needed some help with the mechanics and hey, it helps. A good fitting leopard print bra can help sometimes too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Soper</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15053</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Soper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15053</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I also am not trying to suggest that the heat of passion should be something that makes us want to bear our testimony.&lt;/i&gt;

Michelle, you made my day with that quip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I also am not trying to suggest that the heat of passion should be something that makes us want to bear our testimony.</i></p>
<p>Michelle, you made my day with that quip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarely Home Mom</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15051</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarely Home Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15051</guid>
		<description>[...] they don&#8217;t let you take photos in there.Â  I&#8217;ll just have to go find out.Â  (oh, look - someone went already and reported back.Â  Now you know I&#8217;ve got to go see for myself.Â  They&#8217;re selling religious stuff at an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they don&#8217;t let you take photos in there.Â  I&#8217;ll just have to go find out.Â  (oh, look &#8211; someone went already and reported back.Â  Now you know I&#8217;ve got to go see for myself.Â  They&#8217;re selling religious stuff at an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlejill</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15030</link>
		<dc:creator>littlejill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15030</guid>
		<description>As a guy once put it in my Human Sexual Behavior class at ASU (I&#039;m paraphrasing it)

&quot;There are times for making love and there are times for just &quot;gettin&#039; busy&quot; 
&#039;

I hear that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a guy once put it in my Human Sexual Behavior class at ASU (I&#8217;m paraphrasing it)</p>
<p>&#8220;There are times for making love and there are times for just &#8220;gettin&#8217; busy&#8221;<br />
&#8216;</p>
<p>I hear that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RahRahSisBoomBah</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15027</link>
		<dc:creator>RahRahSisBoomBah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15027</guid>
		<description>Oh, no.  I didn&#039;t put in my name above and I can&#039;t delete it.  Now you all know I&#039;m RahRahSisBoomBah!  I&#039;ll need a new anonymous name - like twinkletoes!
Melonie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no.  I didn&#8217;t put in my name above and I can&#8217;t delete it.  Now you all know I&#8217;m RahRahSisBoomBah!  I&#8217;ll need a new anonymous name &#8211; like twinkletoes!<br />
Melonie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RahRahSisBoomBah</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15026</link>
		<dc:creator>RahRahSisBoomBah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15026</guid>
		<description>So many too respond to!  You have all said such wonderful and interesting comments.  I really appreciate how open you are and willing to discuss these issues.  I am pleasantly surprised!  I thought that I would get a barage of &quot;How dare you, Melonie!  You shouldn&#039;t be writing about this.&quot; So, thank you. 
I really liked Michelle&#039;s comment, &quot;I think our sexual identity should go far beyond what you can find in a store.&quot;  Very nicely put.
I haven&#039;t read Wendy Watson&#039;s book, but considering she was a virgin until in her mid-50&#039;s and then started making love to a man in his 70&#039;s, (don&#039;t quote me on those ages), I might look for someone to read who has had a little more experience.
Belle, you brought up some interesting points I hadn&#039;t considered before.  However, my sister has two daughters from artificial insemination.  She&#039;s never slept with a man.  The current world&#039;s views on sexuality and parenting are in chaos.  
As Mormon women, it is very important that we speak to our children frankly and responsibly about sex-including all of its wonderfulness and its oddities.  
Now some personal responses:
Steve- nothing suggested to me a porn store except the fishnet stockings.  Really, it was very tasteful.  It was just the unexpected LDS books mixed in with the massage oils that threw me for a loop.  I didn&#039;t know what to expect and since I have a limited vocabulary - Mormon porn store is what spewed out.  What should I have called it?  &quot;This is quite a Mormon intimate apparel and KYJelly store you have here!&quot;  I should have just kept quiet.

Hellmut - Having lived in Germany for almost 5 years, I did not see one incident of a man bullying a woman.  However, I witnessed many on the U.S. Air Force Base.  I don&#039;t know what to say - it is sad we don&#039;t teach more respect for one another.  As far as Mormon men goes, let&#039;s hope that isn&#039;t the case for the majority.  But, having had three attempted dry humps on me when I was in my early twenties, I believe disrespectful actions happen more often than we realize.  Just goes to show we need to talk to our girls.  Some might not even know what the boy is doing.

And, I did go into a &quot;Blue Boutique&quot; type store in Germany and WOW those Germans know how to get things going.  Glad I married one...hee, hee.

Angie - Nothing is wrong with buying things on the same day.  I didn&#039;t say that.  I just wondered if women were doing it.  Want to go shopping?

Darlene - Well, what happened next?  Did someone explain it to her?

I&#039;m with Kathryn on being happy the church has no stance on what goes on in the bedroom between husband and wife.  I think I&#039;d be really upset if they did.

Thanks again for your insightful comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many too respond to!  You have all said such wonderful and interesting comments.  I really appreciate how open you are and willing to discuss these issues.  I am pleasantly surprised!  I thought that I would get a barage of &#8220;How dare you, Melonie!  You shouldn&#8217;t be writing about this.&#8221; So, thank you.<br />
I really liked Michelle&#8217;s comment, &#8220;I think our sexual identity should go far beyond what you can find in a store.&#8221;  Very nicely put.<br />
I haven&#8217;t read Wendy Watson&#8217;s book, but considering she was a virgin until in her mid-50&#8242;s and then started making love to a man in his 70&#8242;s, (don&#8217;t quote me on those ages), I might look for someone to read who has had a little more experience.<br />
Belle, you brought up some interesting points I hadn&#8217;t considered before.  However, my sister has two daughters from artificial insemination.  She&#8217;s never slept with a man.  The current world&#8217;s views on sexuality and parenting are in chaos.<br />
As Mormon women, it is very important that we speak to our children frankly and responsibly about sex-including all of its wonderfulness and its oddities.<br />
Now some personal responses:<br />
Steve- nothing suggested to me a porn store except the fishnet stockings.  Really, it was very tasteful.  It was just the unexpected LDS books mixed in with the massage oils that threw me for a loop.  I didn&#8217;t know what to expect and since I have a limited vocabulary &#8211; Mormon porn store is what spewed out.  What should I have called it?  &#8220;This is quite a Mormon intimate apparel and KYJelly store you have here!&#8221;  I should have just kept quiet.</p>
<p>Hellmut &#8211; Having lived in Germany for almost 5 years, I did not see one incident of a man bullying a woman.  However, I witnessed many on the U.S. Air Force Base.  I don&#8217;t know what to say &#8211; it is sad we don&#8217;t teach more respect for one another.  As far as Mormon men goes, let&#8217;s hope that isn&#8217;t the case for the majority.  But, having had three attempted dry humps on me when I was in my early twenties, I believe disrespectful actions happen more often than we realize.  Just goes to show we need to talk to our girls.  Some might not even know what the boy is doing.</p>
<p>And, I did go into a &#8220;Blue Boutique&#8221; type store in Germany and WOW those Germans know how to get things going.  Glad I married one&#8230;hee, hee.</p>
<p>Angie &#8211; Nothing is wrong with buying things on the same day.  I didn&#8217;t say that.  I just wondered if women were doing it.  Want to go shopping?</p>
<p>Darlene &#8211; Well, what happened next?  Did someone explain it to her?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Kathryn on being happy the church has no stance on what goes on in the bedroom between husband and wife.  I think I&#8217;d be really upset if they did.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your insightful comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15023</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15023</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But the whole world does not think of sex in a bad way. &lt;/i&gt;

Sorry...I must not be making my point clearly enough. I&#039;m not necessarily saying the whole world thinks of sex in a bad way. But I am pretty sure that very few in the world really think of sex as a sacred element of a God-sanctioned relationship. Sex can be not-bad but still not have the significance that it does in the plan of salvation. That is my view of why Sister Nelson said what she said, but I could have been reading her wrong. I think it&#039;s less about &#039;they are doing it WRONG and you can do it RIGHT by calling it something else&#039; but more about just trying to encourage a paradigm shift, different from what even many members of the Church may not appreciate. It&#039;s too easy to have a pretty temporal view of this topic, which isn&#039;t necessarily BAD at all but it may not be the BEST. I doubt she thinks that simply changing names would change the whole picture, but as part of a new way of approaching this aspect of life, I can understand what she was getting at.

Does that make more sense?

I do understand the whole &#039;how can she write a book without having been married&#039; but I do think someone can teach true principles even without having experienced them all. I knew motherhood and marriage were divine before I experienced them. Sheri Dew gave some of the best talks on these topics without having experienced them. The Spirit can work that way. I imagine that in her years and years of counseling, she was able to discern truth and what worked. I trust that, even if perhaps the reality of implementing ideals. All I know is that what I read (I haven&#039;t read it all) really felt good and right, for me. What I have found, though, is that sometimes a book will come along that is what I needed at that time, but won&#039;t necessarily have the same impact for someone else. Dif&#039;rent strokes and all that. :)

Ah, I wax longwinded....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But the whole world does not think of sex in a bad way. </i></p>
<p>Sorry&#8230;I must not be making my point clearly enough. I&#8217;m not necessarily saying the whole world thinks of sex in a bad way. But I am pretty sure that very few in the world really think of sex as a sacred element of a God-sanctioned relationship. Sex can be not-bad but still not have the significance that it does in the plan of salvation. That is my view of why Sister Nelson said what she said, but I could have been reading her wrong. I think it&#8217;s less about &#8216;they are doing it WRONG and you can do it RIGHT by calling it something else&#8217; but more about just trying to encourage a paradigm shift, different from what even many members of the Church may not appreciate. It&#8217;s too easy to have a pretty temporal view of this topic, which isn&#8217;t necessarily BAD at all but it may not be the BEST. I doubt she thinks that simply changing names would change the whole picture, but as part of a new way of approaching this aspect of life, I can understand what she was getting at.</p>
<p>Does that make more sense?</p>
<p>I do understand the whole &#8216;how can she write a book without having been married&#8217; but I do think someone can teach true principles even without having experienced them all. I knew motherhood and marriage were divine before I experienced them. Sheri Dew gave some of the best talks on these topics without having experienced them. The Spirit can work that way. I imagine that in her years and years of counseling, she was able to discern truth and what worked. I trust that, even if perhaps the reality of implementing ideals. All I know is that what I read (I haven&#8217;t read it all) really felt good and right, for me. What I have found, though, is that sometimes a book will come along that is what I needed at that time, but won&#8217;t necessarily have the same impact for someone else. Dif&#8217;rent strokes and all that. <img src='http://segullah.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ah, I wax longwinded&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15020</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15020</guid>
		<description>Belle, I offended you. I&#039;m sorry. It wasn&#039;t my intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belle, I offended you. I&#8217;m sorry. It wasn&#8217;t my intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giraffechaser82</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15004</link>
		<dc:creator>giraffechaser82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15004</guid>
		<description>Our stake President years ago told us when we got our interview for a Temple marriage (and this guy was as spiritual a man I ever met) the nicer you are to each other outside the bedroom the better things are inside the bedroom. With several years of constant open communication and practice, his counsel to us was prophetic. We are not vocal about our satisfaction; it is one of the few special things we can share as husband and wife that no one else gets involved in and it is very fulfilling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our stake President years ago told us when we got our interview for a Temple marriage (and this guy was as spiritual a man I ever met) the nicer you are to each other outside the bedroom the better things are inside the bedroom. With several years of constant open communication and practice, his counsel to us was prophetic. We are not vocal about our satisfaction; it is one of the few special things we can share as husband and wife that no one else gets involved in and it is very fulfilling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle</title>
		<link>http://segullah.org/daily-special/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15001</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segullah.org/segullah-article-discussions/warning-content-might-be-offensive-or-without-merit-read-at-your-own-risk/#comment-15001</guid>
		<description>Annie (#23 and #30) I seem to have struck quite a chord with you...often perspective is the issue in these matters...I normally read blogs but choose not to respond to them because they often go on and on and on....with little resolve or change of perspective.  But since I started writing this time here it goes, sigh.
#23 response:  Physiologically speaking, procreation IS dependant upon a man acheiving climax (pleasure) in which ejaculation occurs, whether that is into a cup or a female vigina is up to the man and women generally speaking (aside from forceable rape).  There also seems to be an assumption by you that I&#039;m saying that all procration occurs without female enjoyment which is not what I said,  what I said is I (personally) don&#039;t understood why god made women&#039;s ability to reach climax (pleasure) not dependant on procreation vs a man, that&#039;s just fact...while I understand women&#039;s persceptives on what consistutes &quot;pleasure&quot; may be different.  ie the women whom says she finds pleasure in just pleasing her husband, that being on an emotional level is really not what I&#039;m talking about.  
Response #30:  I also understand very well that the sole purpose of the clitoris is to bring women pleasure...obviously God gave us that for a reason, thankfully, because then seriously what would be the point.  Also, um, I have never had a problem being open (within the divine context of marriage) sexually and DO enjoy a fulfilling sex life with my husband.  These aren&#039;t a &quot;I&#039;m not satisfied sexually&quot; posts.  In fact I was thinking earlier today (before I even read this blog while I was doing dishes this am) about how horrible it is that female circumcisms occur in some cultures and it occued to me that perhaps if female sexual-pleasure was associated with procreation than perhaps some of these barbaic practices wouldn&#039;t occur, since procreation is very important to many of these cultures.  After all it would be akin to cutting off a man&#039;s penis.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie (#23 and #30) I seem to have struck quite a chord with you&#8230;often perspective is the issue in these matters&#8230;I normally read blogs but choose not to respond to them because they often go on and on and on&#8230;.with little resolve or change of perspective.  But since I started writing this time here it goes, sigh.<br />
#23 response:  Physiologically speaking, procreation IS dependant upon a man acheiving climax (pleasure) in which ejaculation occurs, whether that is into a cup or a female vigina is up to the man and women generally speaking (aside from forceable rape).  There also seems to be an assumption by you that I&#8217;m saying that all procration occurs without female enjoyment which is not what I said,  what I said is I (personally) don&#8217;t understood why god made women&#8217;s ability to reach climax (pleasure) not dependant on procreation vs a man, that&#8217;s just fact&#8230;while I understand women&#8217;s persceptives on what consistutes &#8220;pleasure&#8221; may be different.  ie the women whom says she finds pleasure in just pleasing her husband, that being on an emotional level is really not what I&#8217;m talking about.<br />
Response #30:  I also understand very well that the sole purpose of the clitoris is to bring women pleasure&#8230;obviously God gave us that for a reason, thankfully, because then seriously what would be the point.  Also, um, I have never had a problem being open (within the divine context of marriage) sexually and DO enjoy a fulfilling sex life with my husband.  These aren&#8217;t a &#8220;I&#8217;m not satisfied sexually&#8221; posts.  In fact I was thinking earlier today (before I even read this blog while I was doing dishes this am) about how horrible it is that female circumcisms occur in some cultures and it occued to me that perhaps if female sexual-pleasure was associated with procreation than perhaps some of these barbaic practices wouldn&#8217;t occur, since procreation is very important to many of these cultures.  After all it would be akin to cutting off a man&#8217;s penis.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

